Study finds wider spreads outside aggregators in five Solana pools
BROBROK News · Based on reporting by DiarioBitcoin ·
A historical analysis of six Solana pools found that non-aggregated trades had wider realized spreads in five of them. The results suggest a link between routing choice and observed pricing, but they do not show how much a user would save today by changing interfaces.
Key points
- The study matched aggregator and non-aggregator trades by pool, day and trade size.
- Five of the six pools showed wider non-aggregated spreads across most comparable cells.
- ZeroFi was the exception, with a slightly negative matched premium.
- GoonFi showed the largest matched premium at 3.59 basis points.
- The authors note that historical spreads are not the same as wallet fees or guaranteed savings.
Why it matters
For Solana users and market observers, the findings suggest routing can affect execution quality. But the analysis does not prove that switching interfaces will automatically lead to better terms in current trading.
Original headline: “Estudio detecta spreads más amplios fuera de agregadores en cinco pools de Solana”
Read the original on DiarioBitcoin
Summary and analysis written by BROBROK News from the original report. Read the full story on the source website. Not investment advice.